
The world and peculiarities of male grooming do not stand still. Do men now prefer to get rid of excess vegetation? Do women want men with shaved legs? Several views from different trenches.
Guys with shaved legs - is it awful or wonderful? Many modern men have long shaved their armpits and groins, although recently it seemed not a masculine occupation. Is it time to get to other vegetation or is a man's shaved legs too much? Several diametrically opposed opinions from different sides.
A man with shaved legs is bad
If my beloved started shaving his legs once, I would be very surprised. Face, armpits, legs, arms, groin … Why? I don’t care about other people's men and men, but if my young man began to remove hair in those places where it should not be done (in my opinion), I would not approve of it. Wondering where the world is heading? Closer to gloss, to glamor? Smooth female and male feet? Hands? Armpits? What for??? WHY do men shave their legs? Well, groin, armpits - that's understandable, I won't go into details. But legs ?? Lord, even 20 years ago, men's hairy legs did not cause disgust … It was natural. Although for me it is natural even now. No, you can imagine for a moment a guy with shaved hands, shaved breasts and shaved legs. A strange ideal now … Well, a woman, I agree, should be all smooth, like a glossy cover, but men ??? - TKV

And you do not think that we, men and women, subconsciously like each other outwardly for our difference! In this light, the argument "why girls should, and guys shouldn't …" looks absolutely idiotic. You shouldn't, take it easy! It's just that girls look attractive to us with smooth legs - which, however, is also not an indisputable fact. Personally, I am absolutely satisfied with the soft blonde hairs on my girlfriend's legs. Anyway, if you want absolute smoothness, there are marble statues. And a man with shaved legs is generally nonsense! It seems that soon a third floor will appear in general, in which masculine ladies of the "cobble" type and sweet boys with shaved tanned legs will merge. Here are the degenerations! - Brian Boru
Okay, I won't talk about fagots, etc. But here's a simple question: why should men shave their legs? For women? To wear shorts, and women admired your beautiful shaved legs? Rave! For women, men's legs go to one place, especially if these legs are skinny and bluish. Or, maybe, at home in bed, your beloved caressed your tender smooth legs? Double delirium and madness! Debilism. - Complete psycho
A man with shaved legs is right
Shaving your legs is a personal matter. You want it this way, you want it that way, or your ass on the joint. For example, I have too hairy legs … so what? Can brush or braid them. Okay, there would be moderate hair growth, I would not bother with that. And everyone wants to look good. Regarding shaven-legged - gays … or hairiness is a sign of "male" … It seems to me that from a guy to a man they do first of all his actions, and not the presence of hair on his legs. Some stereotypes … "I take drugs and kill people - I'm a real man" - OscaR

It's nice. You will snuggle up to it, warm, soft, so much happiness at once. Is that so? Once I decided to sit between his legs in the same underwear. Horror. Is it injecting everywhere, absolutely everywhere? It’s totally unpleasant. And it's the same with the chest. And after all, the question of justice (we, ladies, shave, so you should) is completely out of the question. After all, it is pleasant for a man to walk his tongue along the leg, on the chest (mine is melting …), to "drink" something from the armpit? And don't snort, feel good enough? So, maybe I also want to circle his nipple with my tongue or drip syrup on his thigh. And there kapets … Tropical thickets … Once I tried to hold a lollipop on my chest … then spat from the hair that stuck to the unfortunate candy … Men, get into the position! If you don’t want it yourself, we will help you! Just give it a green light. - Indeyka
Secondly, the position of some to be brutal and hairy. If he shaves his body hair, it means he’s not a man, well, I don’t know. I have an epilator, I do it and am not shy. By the way, women did not shave either their legs or crotch before, and in the hinterland this procedure is not popular among the fair sex either. So Arnold Schwarzenegger is also not a man, like the heroes of the TV series Sex and the City (I don't remember anyone with a monkey body there). Gymnasts, many athletes who require epilation, too, what do you mean homosexuals? That is, a cross between an orangutan and a primitive man - well, just a sex symbol of our time. - KSHISHTOF

No, it is not fashion that dictates behavior, and not gloss. There is a sense of style, restraint, tact, demeanor, self-respect. A man and a man are two different things. A man is just a creature that watches football, drinks beer in front of the TV and eats chips. He walks the streets in adidas (which is just sick and tired! The impression is that men are degrading) and yelling obscenities with a bottle of beer all over the street. Even in shorts, in which, sorry, eggs are visible. And a man is one who looks after himself, takes care of himself, he does not give a damn about his appearance, because this is the key to success. He will not allow himself to go out in such shorts or in sweatpants with a bottle of beer. This is sad. I'm 16, I'm not bad at myself. I do not shave my legs just because they are not too hairy and I do not wear these for bydlo shorts up to my dick. I shave my armpit hair. And that's okay !!! This is your culture first of all. And if your legs are too hairy, then you need to shave them, because you do not live in a cave and you are not a wild man !!! You are in society! I repeat, this is your culture and hygiene !!! I feel sorry for those "true" men !!! who are called leg-shaving fagots. Yes, you take an example and watch yourself, and do not walk the streets with a bottle of beer. Yes, excessive fawning is not a good thing. A man must remain a MAN !!! But the male core should be manifested in: 1. Actions. It all depends on your actions, not on the shaved legs 2. Appearance. It is required !!! You must take good care of yourself. Shave the armpit. Take a shower regularly! Because underarm hair tends to produce a bad smell, which is a sign of bad taste. 3. Your behavior. You can shave your entire body and still be a great man and have sex and satisfy a woman like no hairy guy can. This is what one should strive for, and not call fagots those who respect themselves and their bodies. Weighing the pros and cons, I am in favor. - vfhrj98

I support. A man with fluffy hair is perceived as an animal for me (no offense said). Such fur animals. The Stone Age is long gone. There came a time when men wore pantyhose, long hair in bows … and powdered profusely. Nobody called them "fagots". Now no one demands such "beauty" from men. It's not obligatory. Likewise, many beauty requirements have gone from women. But nevertheless, a girl must be perfectly groomed at all times at all times, and our man is naturally irresistible … hairy by himself, with a smell, is simply “irresistible”. Is it too brazen? Hare to be lazy! Such men simply cover up their laziness with the words "like fagots." A person is already a person in himself because he has a culture and works on himself. Take care of yourself! Being groomed and being a fagot are not the same thing. You can look at well-groomed men and guys without disgust. You can be near them. If I am drawn to the smelly and hairy, I will go to the zoo. - Haruki
And what do you think?