How to win a girl? Many magazines advise men to storm unapproachable women and seek their favor. But in reality, everything is completely different.
Discussion of the conquest of a woman in one of the forums revealed a certain trend. The majority spoke in favor of the archaism and uselessness of this occupation. Several interesting opinions.
All this garbage with giving flowers or diamonds, singing serenades, victories in some stupid fights, jumping from the roof "for her sake" - what insanity! I absolutely do not understand girls who dream that their boyfriend would risk something for them or do stupid things.
It is disgusting business to CONQUER a woman. After all, what does this mean that there is no unselfish, pure love. But there are a lot of opportunities to manipulate the men, pull them by the nose, hang loose noodles on their ears. Oh, how wonderful it is. Long live harmony.
Honestly, it seems unpromising occupation, thanks to which you can achieve a fragile union of convenience. It seems to me that conquest is more of a ritual. A man and a woman, having met, and having talked for a while, understand, maybe even unconsciously that they are beginning to be drawn to each other, and here a man, if he wants it, should not waste time and begin the rite of conquest.
I am not a supporter of the conquest of women, but I am not a supporter of the so-called. "Democracy" in interpersonal relationships. The democratic idea does not at all mean, from my point of view, that there should be reciprocity and equality in everything. What is meant by the concept of equality - is it when everyone is inferior to everyone in everything? Forcibly, as they say, you will not be nice. And non-violently you will not be nice to anyone in the end - this is also a kind of fact. In any case, if you do not impose your attention and care on a woman, then the interpersonal relationship will not work in the end. You should also not show her constant signs of attention. As Pushkin used to say, the less we love a woman, the more she likes us. I believe that you should find a kind of middle ground: not to be completely lack of initiative, but also not to ask for rudeness with an excess of your attention.
"Conquest" is, as one comrade put it here, is done with the help of all kinds of weapons (tanks and other appropriate equipment). And the object of conquest in such cases is nothing but a trophy. Actually, I don’t respect the kind of girls that require people to jump in front of them. Well, not how you can respect, as a person, if she puts herself as a reward…. And then when she condescends to give herself away and the award is deservedly received by the unfortunate lover, she is surprised why he does not pay attention to me anymore…. And she does not understand that she has already been conquered … Personally, I think that it is more honest and correct if the girl does not assert herself on the sacrifice of her lover, but tries to build a relationship on mutual respect. And he behaves not like a prize, but like a person who knows how and appreciates a man in a guy too! Therefore, it is more correct not to play with the feelings that a person has for you, but to build relationships so as not to hurt each other.
I agree that a woman is not a piece of meat to gnaw each other's throats for it. This is primarily disrespect for the freedom of choice of another person. But it is still worth pursuing and conquering a woman if you are sure that she is not indifferent to you.
I, in general, do not understand why some girls think of themselves as "prizes and awards", turning up their noses, believing that they are better than guys and they are obliged to run after them on their hind legs! And why did they decide that they are a prize? With what fright? Such women have always pissed me off. And the guys who humiliate themselves and run after these bitches - too.
In my opinion, the conquest of a woman is a pointless and useless exercise. For example, I win some kind of beauty, I pay attention to her, I try to please, but then a dude appears who has a lot of money in his pocket, do you think that she will choose me? No! She will pick a dude. Well, what is the point of conquest then? After all, women love money, they love it when they are simply showered with money, driven by expensive cars. And if a man and a woman really love each other, then no conquest is needed.
In principle, not bad. Concerning unlucky fans: let them win with flowers, furs, giblets, nothing will break off anyway! You can't be cute. But to the man whom I like myself, I will fall into the arms without any brulikov!
If we are talking about an adequate normal girl, then this occupation is useless. I consider myself adequate and I am sure that no one will ever be able to conquer me. I love my boyfriend (by the way, he didn't win me over, we just liked each other, began dating, and then fell in love: I almost immediately, he - in a couple / three weeks). No one will be able to take me away from him, because I am confident in my feelings and I do not need anyone else, even if he will at least win himself up to wagging. by the way, in our pair, I was the conqueror - I won my beloved with a good attitude towards them and sincerity of feelings.
"Song - Normal healthy mentally man, with normal testosterone levels …." A normal healthy man with a normal testosterone content is now sitting in front of a computer and wants to surrender (to her) and does not know how to explain it to her even more popularly! And the devil knows what goes into her head … But she doesn't want to communicate in a human way … By the way, I absolutely agree with ABIGAIL “why torture a guy you like”. This does not mean that the girl should immediately lower her panties. But why the heck become obsolete for him (me), life looks like a horror of misunderstanding to blot out my brains 95% of my “beloved” in order to assert itself. I am not at all against performing the prescribed ritual dance in front of a female!
And conquest is a game and it only takes place if the girl really likes you, but according to the rules of the game, she defends herself for some time. And if initially there is no sympathy, no conquest will help; on the contrary, this excessive attention will only irritate her.
Hmm, there is no such thing as conquest among students. I just have to go up and ask for a phone number and I get it right away, although most girls ask me about it first. As for the "conquerors", if they like to crawl on their knees with flowers in their hands and beg the girl to go with him to a restaurant, then this is just a mattress, not worthy of respect. Don't forget about male pride.
An idiotic idea of inter-sex relations, inherited from the primitive and patriarchal class savagery. Indeed, is there a war between the sexes? Why do I and finally the guys have to win someone there? If there is a feeling between people, or at least just sexual attraction, why not hang out together so that both are fun and healthy? What for all these stupid rituals, only time is wasted, but it could be great to spend together. Of course, guys and girls who like them will do nice things, and vice versa - but this should not be a conquest, but simply a manifestation of sympathy.
Enrages. Especially when the girls begin to rant, they say, he must win, achieve. No, well, this is disrespect both for the guy and for yourself. Not only is this lady fooling a man's head, but she also behaves like a fool, breaks down, fills up the price, as if she is bargaining at the bazaar. Well, you have to disrespect yourself so as to stoop to such a thing. If you like a person, then why torture him, and if you don't like it, you must say so right away. These goats are disgusting to me, because because of their bad behavior, guys get the wrong idea about girls in general. How many times have I had, a guy drove up, I told him directly that nothing would happen, and he again for his own. Trying to "conquer". And it pisses me off even more, I said NO, but he does not understand. It turns out before that he had "experience" of communicating with the above-described characters by me. Girls who demand to be "conquered" dishonor the female sex. It's my personal opinion. Normal people don’t fool each other.
The so-called "gentlemen" will say - "A woman must be conquered." But how did you conquer her? For half a year, I ran after her, when she, at that time, beat you off, spent money on her, then got me drunk with my own money and she gave you a thumping one. Conquered !!! She woke up in the morning, spat, regretted what she had done, took a shower. Sounds familiar, gentlemen? Who are they to achieve them?
In nature, males fight for a female; in a civilized society, men fight for a female. No difference. But in our world, where there are fewer men than women, it is time to throw this animal feature into the trash.
Conquest is a fight? Gladiator fight? Knight Tournament? OK. Then the winner takes everything. By ‘everything’ is meant a woman and total control over her, like over a slave or a thing, otherwise the point is to fight? But in the modern world, slavery is unacceptable, and forcing a woman to do what I want, I can go to jail. Accordingly, the tournament is not rolling. Long and tedious beating? Gift? Showered with money and flowers? Driving in different banal places? Alas, this is a little more than completely ineffective. So, the subject is definitely in the firebox.
Many men believe that if they give a woman gifts, money, services, then sooner or later she will fall in love with them (well, or at least will give). By doing this, from the very beginning, they doom themselves to failure, trying to build barter relations, thereby relegating a woman to the level of a commodity, ignoring her as a person, a person. They give gifts, get nothing or get little, and then yell - "all women are whores!" Themselves are to blame, aren't they? Look for those who are compatible with yourself, and do not chase after those to whom you are indifferent. It is certainly necessary to win a woman, this conquest is rather psychological, and consists in creating healthy relationships.
Because such "inaccessible" girls very honestly turn out to be hypocritical slut. You will meet such one, she says, “I am proud, I need a worthy one,” and then you see her with a daddy ten years older and all her pride disappeared somewhere.
I have met such girls. They pretend to be absolutely indifferent to you, but in fact they are waiting for you to start hitting on them. But that’s the kind of person I am, I don’t break into a locked door. No, I think a girl should also take some steps towards a meeting, if she wants to.
