A man is able to radically change his attitude towards sex for the better. How to become a real man and a sex giant at the same time? Male sexuality, as asexuality, is a profitable business. Valery Saltykov (aphorisms)
How to become a master of sex
Remembering myself as a teenager, I always ran into one of the most desirable of all desires - to become the coolest guy in sex. Then many guys, older in age, told all sorts of plausible, at least for me, stories in which they painted themselves as a kind of Alyosha Popovich hunting for girls' butts. I listened, envied, tried not to show interest, but in the evenings, afternoons, mornings, yes, in general, whenever the opportunity presented itself, I gave out the accumulated energy. When “this very thing” happened for the first time, my readiness was theoretically outrageous, but practice showed something completely different: most of what my friends told me turned out to be completely inapplicable in practice. At times, attempts to implement something looked generally ridiculous, namely, purely physically impossible. It's funny, but in sex theory and practice are in agreement with hardly a quarter, otherwise they are as individual as people who have applied all this in their sex life. I had to go to who I am today through trial and error. Yes, sex for me has become a norm of life and all other joys only complement it, but this hardly affects mental, especially physical abilities and capabilities, unless only for the better. That is why in this section I devote so much time to the analysis of male sexuality from ordinary to the one for which a man, in fact, should live and be healthy. Whether it is right or not, I don’t know, it just happened and I don’t regret it at all. So you can follow me, reader, or you can choose your own path, just remember, a real man and his sexual capabilities are inseparable concepts and cannot exist without each other.
Yes, I know what others are saying about this, they say, there is no need to compare a man with an animal, endowing him with similar sexual instincts, but don't you and I belong to the class of mammals? Or do you seriously think that reason has been given to us in order to explain to ourselves the refusal of idle copulation, for the sake of its main function of maintaining the population size? Well, then the flag in hand and don't even try to read these ten postulates that can make you a real man and a sex giant at the same time.
a real man always wants sexual intimacy, but never allows a woman to use this circumstance to control herself;
a real man never blindly goes about his sexual desires, first he prepares a woman for this purpose, forcing her to be imbued with the significance of the moment and only then justifies her hopes as much as possible;
a real man knows all the tricks of women, their tricks, abilities, opportunities … therefore, he does not demand more, he requires no less than what a woman can afford in bed and does so every time, not allowing everyday life to take over the situation;
a real man is not afraid of other people's women and men who may interfere with the formation of his status, but he never deliberately provokes conflicts, preferring to achieve everything with kindness and consent;
a real man always sets himself the goal of achieving a female orgasm and follows her at any cost, often to the detriment of his own time, pleasure and even health, because he knows how such a result will turn out for him in the future;
a real man does not know defeats, since both victories and defeats provide him with new necessary information, thanks to which he only improves, not allowing negativity to accumulate in his mind and under him;
a real man can be promiscuous in relationships, but is true to his word, therefore, he never deceives a woman, presenting himself as he is, without trying to lie for himself an advantageous position relative to other applicants for her mind and body;
a real man is a real hunter, for whom the weaker sex is the game, therefore he carefully observes all the laws of the genre, overcoming the “game” quickly and efficiently, not allowing her to feel like a victim either before, during or after;
a real man is not devoid of feelings as such, just his feelings do not have a destructive effect, since they act exclusively by creating competent relationships between partners, disconnecting when one of them backs down;
a real man is not yet a sexual giant and may never even become one, but he strives for this, in necessary cases replacing an unsatisfactory physiology with a competent organization of sexual life, taking into account all modern methods and means.
Before I throw my idea of what a macho should be on you, let's figure out a little more, because you are unlikely to understand what I mean if you do not enter into such a vague concept as a man's sexual preoccupation. The fact is that offhand the majority of men attribute such a zealous desire of a man to bed rest not in one to a certain painful state, and some males even hesitate to publish such a desire for their own body under the control of the brain pleasure center, but this is hardly good. Therefore, I set out to find out what is good and what is bad, and right now, without leaving the checkout, in the sense of the keyboard. Let's start with the definition.
So, a man's sexual preoccupation is automatically adding sexual connotation to all his thoughts, regardless of the situation in which he is. Simply put, these are constant thoughts about sex in its various incarnations, as it was in the era of his hypersexual youth. And now the actual question itself: can adolescent hypersexuality be classified as a disease? In my opinion, and indeed in the opinion of a sane person, it is unlikely. And the second question: why is adolescent sexual preoccupation a consequence of the restructuring of the body and the harmonization of hormonal balance, while male sexual preoccupation, with some kind of fright, by default belongs to the category of painful deviations? I read somewhere that sexologists decided to generalize people who are preoccupied with having sex with alcoholics, drug addicts, gambling addicts and other addicted people, calling them the bad word sexaholics. With such a neighborhood, talking about sexual preoccupation as a person's desire to please himself and his partner will definitely not turn his tongue, but is it possible to generalize such incompatible things in one bottle?
Tell the reader what an alcoholic, drug addict, gamer or gambler (a lover of gambling) needs to get his buzz from his addiction - got it right - you need babos, money. Now tell me, how many babos do you need to satisfy ten partners at a time, and they are also slightly preoccupied with sex? How can you do it for any money? But what about the parallel with alcoholism? Do you smell the catch? It turns out that you can mix sour with unleavened, but not in this particular case. For sexual preoccupation to arise, one psychological or mental factor of stimulation, as occurs in sexual mania, is clearly not enough. It requires an active libido, fed by the male hormonal system according to a special diet. Here is the answer: anyone and everyone can become a drug addict or an alcoholic gambler, but for no reason at all to attend to sex, and even really, not in words - only a chosen one. If you agree with this alignment - scroll further and read more carefully, if you prefer to leave everything as it is and not fall asleep and wake up with an erect penis - find yourself a more digestible reading matter. You can also live like this, not everyone can become real men in terms of sex, for someone it is enough to be who he is according to the starting gene protocol. Calm down, we will not intrude into such complex programs, my brains will not be enough, but to give a little sexual concern to the sufferer - why not? You see, in order to achieve this goal, it is not at all necessary to become a sexual maniac, as it may seem to the ignorant, it is enough to tune your own psyche in a certain way, well, and find a partner who will help to realize this mood in full. Yes, among the weak-sex there are also such, they just have a pipe with the implementation of the general: drug addicts, drunks, gambling addicts and other "preoccupied" people in sex rarely can do anything, despite belonging to a group.
So, if you want to know the degrees of sexual preoccupation - memorize:
weak - a man is always ready for sex, but not with everyone, while he loves to have sex, bringing into it all the variety of traditional coitus and most of the sexual perversions available to an ordinary person;
middle - a man is always ready for sex, and with anyone, while sex is a priority for him in relation to other areas of life, and its various incarnations, including sexual perversion, are not associated with extreme and transcendental sex;
strong - a man lives by sex and for his sake, while all his life activities are inextricably linked with him, and the number of sexual incarnations multiplies without any restrictions, often pushing a person beyond the brink of prudence, trampling on his instinct for self-preservation.
I agree that this approach can be scary, but if you are offered to jump the world altitude record or to train predatory animals, you will also be frightened and hardly cope, especially if there are no inclinations and an extraordinary desire to achieve results. A similar situation is proposed here, although with less risk to life than in the example with training, besides, I do not call for mastering "strong" and "medium" concerns, a real macho (not to be confused with schmuck) is quite enough to immerse your mind in the initial stage, and only then act according to the circumstances. I will talk separately about the so-called sexual excesses, but to the point I want to say that sexual preoccupation does not apply to them at all and does not imply fucking partners to the point of insanity, contrary to their wishes and capabilities. This is, how can I say to you, gaining the wisdom of sex, when the number of women in your bed no longer matters, because the quality of sex with each of them, like a real man, always leads to one positive result. I am often asked if there is any special male behavior that has a win-win effect on the surrounding weaker sex - yes, it exists and it is called self-confidence and capabilities. From the outside, it looks something like this: a man throughout his life is looking for ways to realize his own sexual powers, while he does not try to hide his searches, allowing women to help him in this. Why "women", and not say a woman - Duc, after all, this is a no brainer: there is a thread from the world, coitus from each lady, so the male picks up for a coat and for pleasure. Although, in my opinion, one can also try to achieve perfection in monogamy, only mental and physical strength will have to be spent many times more, and money too.
Age and machoism
The question is, at what age you can become a man with a capital letter - yes, from anyone, there would be a desire and a suitable woman or woman. Note, I mentioned only desire and "means of production" in the form of the fairer sex, without even remembering the capabilities of the organism, and you know why - because no one has ever managed to scoop up their supply to the bottom. It’s in some kind of petty theory that a man is given a certain amount of ejaculations for everything about everything; in fact, at the end of the sexual path, the body even has to strain in order to get rid of everything that is not in demand. And you thought, why "the demon in the rib" is always associated with gray hair? Demons - they are also men, and what kind of man wants to live this life without leaving a deep sexual trace. However, I still recommend not to postpone initiation into a real man in such a distant box, and here's why: habit is second nature, therefore, with age, trying to rebuild something in a life that has long been settled is extremely difficult. You yourself see how ridiculous the males look, intending to become the leaders of the flock, starting when their age has already finished. In short, the optimal age for the formation of a man falls on the second decade of his life, that is, up to twenty. It was during this period that the attitude towards the opposite sex, sex and their role in all this was laid. As long as there are no obstructing attitudes, all decisions are easy and simple, but as soon as the dominant opinion of society appears, the obviousness of the obvious may seem unobvious. From that moment on, turning into a sex giant requires very serious motivation in the form of a desire to prove something to someone at any cost. As a rule, in such situations a lot of firewood breaks, so now I will not be too lazy and sketch out a dozen points that can provide sexual growth relatively painlessly. No, this is not a panacea, but it will not be superfluous to consider at your leisure. So:
a man who cannot do anything in bed is always bad, who can, even if he is bad in something else, always find an excuse and a woman will accept this excuse even in a completely unacceptable form;
no one, even the woman herself, has no idea what method or way she will achieve maximum satisfaction in partner sex, therefore a real man should experiment not only within the framework of generally accepted copulation, but seek out non-standard options for it;
experience really comes with age, but this does not apply to sex, because in it theory, practice and age itself affect male psychophysiology according to a different scheme - only DAILY searches for sexual satisfaction (not necessarily with orgasm and ejaculation) are able to multiply sexual experience and it does not matter in what age will this "multiplication" begin;
a paradox, but a man's sexual experience WILL NOT DEPEND on the number of women who have had sexual contact with him, because each such act does not necessarily have a positive developmental dynamics, that is, it often “tramples in the initial phase” - in order to ensure proper sexual growth, a man needs to determine its phases on one's own;
sexual gigantism is not a consequence of the peculiarities of a man's sexual constitution, as it is commonly believed, it is just getting rid of age-old prejudices designed to restrain various manifestations of sexual life, as well as an overestimation of their significance for life in general;
many representatives of the fairer sex give an unflattering assessment of men leading a hypersexual lifestyle, but even they secretly dream of being in the arms of such a "stallion", which they do at the first opportunity to do this, especially if the secret of copulation is guaranteed;
a real man in sex is not at all a tall muscular handsome man with a penis below the knee and a suitcase of money in the back pocket of his trousers - he is an ordinary sexual altruist for whom the satisfaction of a woman is above all and who will never go into my book for another way to achieve this directly during copulation, having learned everything by heart in advance;
macho (sex giant) - does not mean obligatory debauchery and desire to possess any woman who turns up, this is a state of mind and body that allows you to raise sexual relations to a new quality level and this can be done even with one single partner who shares a similar desire;
perhaps it will be unpleasant for someone to hear this, but competent sex SHOULD NOT be accompanied by doping in the form of intoxicating drinks and other pathogens widely advertised by modern pseudo-medicine and other charlatans - machoism is a man's sexuality in its purest form, otherwise sooner or later he will not have to part only with hypersexuality, but sexuality in general.
Damn, from behind it was calculated that I missed item number ten !? Well, excuse the sclerotik, I’ll fix it now:
any man - I emphasize - absolutely any man is able to radically change his attitude towards sex for the better or for the worse, but if the second basically does not depend on our desire, the first depends entirely on him. It is on this basis that women in their hearts despise males who are not capable of giving them pleasure, and … they do right … Reader, the latter does not apply to you, these are those who are too good at counting, looking over my writings over their shoulders, although …
